ALABAMA HERITAGE
  • Magazine
    • Current and Back Issues >
      • Back Issues 141-150 >
        • Issue 147, Winter 2023
        • Issue 146, Fall 2022
        • Issue 145, Summer 2022
        • Issue 144, Spring 2022
        • Issue 143, Winter 2022
        • Issue 142, Fall 2021
        • Issue 141, Summer 2021
      • Back Issues 131-140 >
        • Issue 140, Spring 2021
        • Issue 139, Winter 2021
        • Issue 138, Fall 2020
        • Issue 137, Summer 2020
        • Issue 136, Spring 2020
        • Issue 135, Winter 2020
        • Issue 134, Fall 2019
        • Issue 133, Summer 2019
        • Issue 132 Spring 2019
        • Issue 131, Winter 2019
      • Back Issues 121-130 >
        • Issue 130, Fall 2018
        • Issue 129, Summer 2018
        • Issue 128, Spring 2018
        • Issue 127, Winter 2018
        • Issue 126, Fall 2017
        • Issue 125 Summer 2017
        • Issue 124, Spring 2017
        • Issue 123, Winter 2017
        • Issue 122, Fall 2016
        • Issue 121, Summer 2016
      • Back Issues 111-120 >
        • Issue 120, Spring 2016
        • Issue 119, Winter 2016
        • Issue 118, Fall 2015
        • Issue 117, Summer 2015
        • Issue 116, Spring 2015
        • Issue 115, Winter 2015
        • Issue 114, Fall 2014
        • Issue 113, Summer 2014
        • Issue 112, Spring 2014
        • Issue 111, Winter 2014
      • Back Issues 101-110 >
        • Issue 110, Fall 2013
        • Issue 109, Summer 2013
        • Issue 108, Spring 2013
        • Issue 107, Winter 2013
        • Issue 106, Fall 2012
        • Issue 105, Summer 2012
        • Issue 104, Spring 2012
        • Issue 103, Winter 2012
        • Issue 102, Fall 2011
        • Issue 101, Summer 2011
      • Back Issues 91-100 >
        • Issue 100, Spring 2011
        • Issue 99, Winter 2011
        • Issue 98, Fall 2010
        • Issue 97, Summer 2010
        • Issue 96, Spring 2010
        • Issue 95, Winter 2010
        • Issue 94, Fall 2009
        • Issue 93, Summer 2009
        • Issue 92, Spring 2009
        • Issue 91, Winter 2009
      • Back Issues 81-90 >
        • Issue 90, Fall 2008
        • Issue 89, Summer 2008
        • Issue 88, Spring 2008
        • Issue 87, Winter 2008
        • Issue 86, Fall 2007
        • Issue 85, Summer 2007
        • Issue 84, Spring 2007
        • Issue 83, Winter 2007
        • Issue 82, Fall 2006
        • Issue 81, Summer 2006
      • Back Issues 71-80 >
        • Issue 80, Spring 2006
        • Issue 79, Winter 2006
        • Issue 78, Fall 2005
        • Issue 77, Summer 2005
        • Issue 76, Spring 2005
        • Issue 75, Winter 2005
        • Issue 74, Fall 2004
        • Issue 73, Summer 2004
        • Issue 72, Spring 2004
        • Issue 71, Winter 2004
      • Back Issues 61-70 >
        • Issue 70, Fall 2003
        • Issue 69, Summer 2003
        • Issue 68, Spring 2003
        • Issue 67, Winter 2003
        • Issue 66, Fall 2002
        • Issue 65, Summer 2002
        • Issue 64, Spring 2002
        • Issue 63, Winter 2002
        • Issue 62, Fall 2001
        • Issue 61, Summer 2001
      • Back Issues 51-60 >
        • Issue 60, Spring 2001
        • Issue 59, Winter 2001
        • Issue 58, Fall 2000
        • Issue 57, Summer 2000
        • Issue 56, Spring 2000
        • Issue 55, Winter 2000
        • Issue 54, Fall 1999
        • Issue 53, Summer 1999
        • Issue 52, Spring 1999
        • Issue 51, Winter 1999
      • Back Issues 41-50 >
        • Issue 50, Fall 1998
        • Issue 49, Summer 1998
        • Issue 48, Spring 1998
        • Issue 47, Winter 1998
        • Issue 46, Fall 1997
        • Issue 45, Summer 1997
        • Issue 44, Spring 1997
        • Issue 43, Winter 1997
        • Issue 42, Fall 1996
        • Issue 41, Summer 1996
      • Back Issues 31-40 >
        • Issue 40, Spring 1996
        • Issue 39, Winter 1996
        • Issue 38, Fall 1995
        • Issue 37, Summer 1995
        • Issue 36, Spring 1995
        • Issue 35, Winter 1995
        • Issue 34, Fall 1994
        • Issue 33, Summer 1994
        • Issue 32, Spring 1994
        • Issue 31, Winter 1994
      • Back Issues 21-30 >
        • Issue 30, Fall 1993
        • Issue 29, Summer 1993
        • Issue 28, Spring 1993
        • Issue 27, Winter 1993
        • Issue 26, Fall 1992
        • Issue 25, Summer 1992
        • Issue 24, Spring 1992
        • Issue 23, Winter 1992
        • Issue 22, Fall 1991
        • Issue 21, Summer 1991
      • Back Issues 11-20 >
        • Issue 20, Spring 1991
        • Issue 19, Winter 1991
        • Issue 18, Fall 1990
        • Issue 17, Summer 1990
        • Issue 16, Spring 1990
        • Issue 15, Winter 1990
        • Issue 14, Fall 1989
        • Issue 13, Summer 1989
        • Issue 12, Spring 1989
        • Issue 11, Winter 1989
      • Back Issues 1-10 >
        • Issue 10, Fall 1988
        • Issue 9, Summer 1988
        • Issue 8, Spring 1988
        • Issue 7, Winter 1988
        • Issue 6, Fall 1987
        • Issue 5, Summer 1987
        • Issue 4, Spring 1987
        • Issue 3, Winter 1987
        • Issue 2, Fall 1986
        • Issue 1, Summer 1986
    • Digital Features
    • Links of Interest
    • Bonus Materials >
      • Adventures in Genealogy
      • Alabama Heritage Blog
      • Alabama Territory
      • Becoming Alabama >
        • Creek War Era
        • Civil War Era
        • Civil Rights Movement
      • From the Vault
      • History in Ruins
      • Places in Peril
      • Recipes
  • Online Store
    • Customer Service
  • About Us
    • Awards
    • Meet Our Team
    • News
    • Writer's Guidelines and Submissions
  • Search
  • Donate
Published by The University of Alabama,
The University of Alabama at Birmingham,
and the Alabama Department of Archives and History

Alabama Territory: Winter 1819

1/7/2019

0 Comments

 
Second Bank of the United States
The tight money policies of the Second Bank of the United States, headquartered in Philadelphia (above), were blamed for the length and depth of the recession following the Panic of 1819, particularly in the South and West, where borrowed money was needed to buy land on the frontier. The loss of credit caused many Alabama landowners to default on their loans. (Library of Congress)
In many ways the year Alabama became a state stands as among the least auspicious of its tumultuous territorial experience. Shortly after the turn of the New Year in 1819, a land heretofore showcasing steady economic growth, generous and easy credit, wide-ranging speculation, and general optimism among a swelling population suddenly entered a severe economic downturn that threatened to reverse its previous progress. Known to historians as the Panic of 1819, this first major depression in US history struck Alabama particularly hard and carried far-ranging repercussions that resonated well into its first decade of statehood. 
The root causes of the depression are tangled and complex, but it is generally agreed that at its heart lay a combination of overextension of credit in the heady years after the War of 1812, a rash of unregulated banking and questionable financial management of the Second Bank of the United States, lowered demand for cotton in Europe as it began to tap into Indian markets, and declining prices for manufactured goods. Alabama essentially became the front lines of the disaster in the South, as cotton and land sales financed by its fledgling banks were the very lifeblood of its economic engine. In early 1819 the first tremors of the impending calamity hit when cotton prices began to falter. By summer they had plummeted to twelve cents per pound after an extended period in which they averaged over twice that and at times had reached over thirty cents per pound. The cascading series of disasters that resulted brought widespread economic ruin over much of Alabama for an extended period, as shaken financial institutions stopped issuing loans and countless debtors suddenly defaulted on loans for the soil they tilled. The financial collapse unraveled the very fabric of frontier communities across the territory, as the informal and unregulated methods of extending credit and repaying debt—often sealed with little more than handshakes and letters of recommendation obligating friends and family as security on loans—collapsed on itself like so many dominoes and swamped communities in wholesale fashion. By some estimates as much as half the nation’s land debt lay in Alabama at the onset of the panic, and debtors ended up relinquishing enormous swaths of acreage. In the Huntsville area alone, the federal government reclaimed some 400,000 acres within three years. Reactions to the setbacks ranged from fleeing the scene to suicide.

​The panic’s repercussions extended far beyond the purely economic realm in Alabama. In some ways it redefined the political landscape, since in finding a scapegoat for the calamity Alabamians believed they discovered their former heroes from Georgia might just have been a self-serving cabal. The roots of the “Royal Party’s” demise, like the crisis itself, are tangled and deep but indisputably can be traced to the remarkable degree with which the small group of wealthy and politically connected Georgians guided Alabama through its territorial experience. They held leadership positions in its legislature and its financial institutions, and when the financial storm struck, they came under brutal scrutiny.
 
That many of them were associated with the embattled Planters and Merchants Bank would come to hang, albatross- like, around their collective necks as the depression dismantled homesteads the next year. Under the heat of the spotlight steadily applied by resentful antagonists, even former steadfast allies such as planter and financier Israel Pickens would separate from the Georgians. Running as “champions of the people,” these defectors soon banded together to claim more than their fair share of important offices. The panic did not end the days of the “Royal Party” power brokers in Alabama politics, but it marked the beginning of its demise.
The panic did not end the days of the “Royal Party” power brokers in Alabama politics, but it marked the beginning of its demise.
While still in the throes of economic setbacks and the beginning stages of its first true political rivalry, cruel reminders that the territory could be a harsh place to make a living seemed to abound with an unprecedented vigor in 1819. On July 27, an intense hurricane slammed into Mobile, leaving a swath of destruction all along the Mississippi and Alabama coasts. Alligators and boats floated through the streets, and innumerable felled trees blocked roads throughout the region. “The whole coast from Rigolets to Mobile,” reported the New Orleans Courier, was “a scene of desolation, covered with fragments of vessels and houses, the bodies of human beings, and the carcasses of cattle.” That same month a particularly insidious outbreak of dreaded yellow fever struck Mobile as well, bringing business to a standstill. Commonly known at the time as “yellow jack,” the fever is a viral disease spread by mosquitoes. After a short incubation period, it manifests itself in a variety of unpleasant ways, including fever, headache, nausea, muscle pains, and the tell-tale yellowish tint to the skin caused by liver damage. Many of those who contracted the illness died within a matter of days—sometimes even hours. Fully half of Mobile’s residents are believed to have fled the area, and hundreds of those who remained died.
 
Yet even as such disasters ravished the territory, momentum continued to carry it towards its statehood destiny. Early in 1819 in the nation’s capital, a petition to Congress requesting immediate statehood, sent during the previous legislative session, had come up for discussion. Citing the “unparalleled tide of emigration, invited by the general fertility of our soil and the happy temperature of our Climate… daily flowing into the bosom of our Territory,” author John W. Walker insisted that its citizens “cannot conceive, how it could promote the interest of the national government, longer, to withhold from the people of Alabama the right they solicit.” He also reminded Congress that, with a population of nearly 70,000 people, the Alabama Territory easily surpassed the population of the recently admitted state of Mississippi and compared favorably to Indiana and Illinois, which entered the Union in 1816 and 1818, respectively. Sen. Charles Tait, close friend of many in the tight-knit Georgia Faction and soon to be resident of Alabama himself, guided the bill through Congress. On March 2, Pres. James Monroe signed the act that led to the state of Alabama. The act set forth the steps that needed to be taken for the new state to be admitted into the Union, including writing a constitution and establishing a government, and specified that elections be held in May to choose delegates to a July constitutional convention. Ironically, within a year that highlighted all that could go wrong on the frontier, Alabama finally prepared to make the transition that would mark the beginning of a bright new chapter in its story. ​
Subscribe to Alabama Heritage
Join Our Email List
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Mike Bunn currently serves as director of operations at  Historic Blakeley State Park in Spanish Fort, Alabama. This department of Alabama Heritage magazine  is sponsored by the Alabama Bicentennial Commission and the Alabama Tourism Department.

    More Alabama Territory

    Archives

    October 2019
    July 2019
    April 2019
    January 2019
    November 2018
    July 2018
    April 2018
    January 2018
    October 2017
    July 2017

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Online Store
​Customer Service
Meet Our Team
Board of Directors
Corporate Sponsors
News
Join Our Email List

Employment
UA Disclaimer
UA Privacy Policy ​
​Website comments or questions?  

Email ah.online@ua.edu
Published by The University of Alabama, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, and the Alabama Department of Archives and History
​Alabama Heritage
Box 870342
Tuscaloosa, AL 35487
Local: (205) 348-7467
Toll-Free: (877) 925-2323
Fax: (205) 348-7473

alabama.heritage@ua.edu