Alabama Heritage
  • Home
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Back Issues >
      • Back Issues 131-140 >
        • Issue 139, Winter 2021
        • Issue 138, Fall 2020
        • Issue 137, Summer 2020
        • Issue 136, Spring 2020
        • Issue 135, Winter 2020
        • Issue 134, Fall 2019
        • Issue 133, Summer 2019
        • Issue 132 Spring 2019
        • Issue 131, Winter 2019
      • Back Issues 121-130 >
        • Issue 130, Fall 2018
        • Issue 129, Summer 2018
        • Issue 128, Spring 2018
        • Issue 127, Winter 2018
        • Issue 126, Fall 2017
        • Issue 125 Summer 2017
        • Issue 124, Spring 2017
        • Issue 123, Winter 2017
        • Issue 122, Fall 2016
        • Issue 121, Summer 2016
      • Back Issues 111-120 >
        • Issue 120, Spring 2016
        • Issue 119, Winter 2016
        • Issue 118, Fall 2015
        • Issue 117, Summer 2015
        • Issue 116, Spring 2015
        • Issue 115, Winter 2015
        • Issue 114, Fall 2014
        • Issue 113, Summer 2014
        • Issue 112, Spring 2014
        • Issue 111, Winter 2014
      • Back Issues 101-110 >
        • Issue 110, Fall 2013
        • Issue 109, Summer 2013
        • Issue 108, Spring 2013
        • Issue 107, Winter 2013
        • Issue 106, Fall 2012
        • Issue 105, Summer 2012
        • Issue 104, Spring 2012
        • Issue 103, Winter 2012
        • Issue 102, Fall 2011
        • Issue 101, Summer 2011
      • Back Issues 91-100 >
        • Issue 100, Spring 2011
        • Issue 99, Winter 2011
        • Issue 98, Fall 2010
        • Issue 97, Summer 2010
        • Issue 96, Spring 2010
        • Issue 95, Winter 2010
        • Issue 94, Fall 2009
        • Issue 93, Summer 2009
        • Issue 92, Spring 2009
        • Issue 91, Winter 2009
      • Back Issues 81-90 >
        • Issue 90, Fall 2008
        • Issue 89, Summer 2008
        • Issue 88, Spring 2008
        • Issue 87, Winter 2008
        • Issue 86, Fall 2007
        • Issue 85, Summer 2007
        • Issue 84, Spring 2007
        • Issue 83, Winter 2007
        • Issue 82, Fall 2006
        • Issue 81, Summer 2006
      • Back Issues 71-80 >
        • Issue 80, Spring 2006
        • Issue 79, Winter 2006
        • Issue 78, Fall 2005
        • Issue 77, Summer 2005
        • Issue 76, Spring 2005
        • Issue 75, Winter 2005
        • Issue 74, Fall 2004
        • Issue 73, Summer 2004
        • Issue 72, Spring 2004
        • Issue 71, Winter 2004
      • Back Issues 61-70 >
        • Issue 70, Fall 2003
        • Issue 69, Summer 2003
        • Issue 68, Spring 2003
        • Issue 67, Winter 2003
        • Issue 66, Fall 2002
        • Issue 65, Summer 2002
        • Issue 64, Spring 2002
        • Issue 63, Winter 2002
        • Issue 62, Fall 2001
        • Issue 61, Summer 2001
      • Back Issues 51-60 >
        • Issue 60, Spring 2001
        • Issue 59, Winter 2001
        • Issue 58, Fall 2000
        • Issue 57, Summer 2000
        • Issue 56, Spring 2000
        • Issue 55, Winter 2000
        • Issue 54, Fall 1999
        • Issue 53, Summer 1999
        • Issue 52, Spring 1999
        • Issue 51, Winter 1999
      • Back Issues 41-50 >
        • Issue 50, Fall 1998
        • Issue 49, Summer 1998
        • Issue 48, Spring 1998
        • Issue 47, Winter 1998
        • Issue 46, Fall 1997
        • Issue 45, Summer 1997
        • Issue 44, Spring 1997
        • Issue 43, Winter 1997
        • Issue 42, Fall 1996
        • Issue 41, Summer 1996
      • Back Issues 31-40 >
        • Issue 40, Spring 1996
        • Issue 39, Winter 1996
        • Issue 38, Fall 1995
        • Issue 37, Summer 1995
        • Issue 36, Spring 1995
        • Issue 35, Winter 1995
        • Issue 34, Fall 1994
        • Issue 33, Summer 1994
        • Issue 32, Spring 1994
        • Issue 31, Winter 1994
      • Back Issues 21-30 >
        • Issue 30, Fall 1993
        • Issue 29, Summer 1993
        • Issue 28, Spring 1993
        • Issue 27, Winter 1993
        • Issue 26, Fall 1992
        • Issue 25, Summer 1992
        • Issue 24, Spring 1992
        • Issue 23, Winter 1992
        • Issue 22, Fall 1991
        • Issue 21, Summer 1991
      • Back Issues 11-20 >
        • Issue 20, Spring 1991
        • Issue 19, Winter 1991
        • Issue 18, Fall 1990
        • Issue 17, Summer 1990
        • Issue 16, Spring 1990
        • Issue 15, Winter 1990
        • Issue 14, Fall 1989
        • Issue 13, Summer 1989
        • Issue 12, Spring 1989
        • Issue 11, Winter 1989
      • Back Issues 1-10 >
        • Issue 10, Fall 1988
        • Issue 9, Summer 1988
        • Issue 8, Spring 1988
        • Issue 7, Winter 1988
        • Issue 6, Fall 1987
        • Issue 5, Summer 1987
        • Issue 4, Spring 1987
        • Issue 3, Winter 1987
        • Issue 2, Fall 1986
        • Issue 1, Summer 1986
    • Digital Features
    • Links of Interest
  • Bonus Materials
    • Adventures in Genealogy
    • Alabama Heritage Blog
    • Alabama Territory
    • Becoming Alabama >
      • Creek War Era
      • Civil War Era
      • Civil Rights Movement
    • From the Vault
    • History in Ruins
    • Places in Peril
    • Recipes
  • Online Store
    • Customer Service
  • About Us
    • Awards
    • Board of Directors
    • Corporate Sponsors
    • Employment Opportunities
    • Meet Our Team
    • News
    • Writer's Guidelines and Submissions
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Join our Email List
Published by The University of Alabama,
The University of Alabama at Birmingham,
and the Alabama Department of Archives and History

Alabama Territory: Spring 1818

4/3/2018

0 Comments

 
PictureAn engraving based on "Gang of Negro Slaves shipping Cotton from a Plantation on the Alabama River, by torchlight--on a Steam Boat for Mobile," painted by William Henry Brooke in 1839. (Alabama Archives)
The Alabama Territory’s cultural and economic landscape was well defined by spring 1818. As the territory entered its second year of existence, cotton, transportation networks to facilitate its trade, and a fundamental reliance on slave labor had meshed to form the key parts of the structural bedrock on which the new state would rise. During the year ahead, these aspects of the territorial experience would both cement and extend their influence into virtually every aspect of Alabama life. One particularly significant area was transportation. Alabama’s first steamboats were a far cry from the floating palaces of river travel’s heyday—slower, smaller, and far less powerful or reliable than those of the coming generation—but they marked the beginning of the era of revolution in riverine transportation.

 In February 1818 the St. Stephens Steamboat Company was organized at its namesake community along the Tombigbee, within a year launching the first steam-powered vessel built in the state, appropriately named the Alabama. Within eighteen months pioneer builders at Blakeley had launched the Mississippi and the Tensa. Suddenly it appeared that round-trip journeys—such as those from the territorial interior to its gulf outlet at Mobile or even from the Tennessee Valley to New Orleans—that had previously taken weeks or even months might be reduced to a matter of days. These early boats carried their fair share of passengers, but their ability to transport cotton made them central to Alabama’s ascendance as a key competitor in the international cotton trade.

In truth cotton animated many aspects of life in early Alabama. It encouraged the area’s settlement, provided the impetus for much of its infrastructural development, and underlay much of its economic activity. Cotton was Alabama’s cash crop from its inception. The ebbs and flows of its price on international markets served as the bellwether for the health of the territory’s overall financial status. Statistics on Mobile’s fiber exports show the steady consuming progress of its cultivation, which took root in its territorial years and soon dominated the state’s economy. In 1818 the port shipped fewer than 10,000 bales; by the 1840s Alabama had become the nation’s leader in cotton production, and that figure hovered around 500,000 bales. Observers in the Alabama Territory, such as the ever-insightful Anne Royall, would not have been surprised by the centrality of cotton to the future state’s life. In January 1818 on a Tennessee River Valley plantation, she beheld the first cotton field she had ever seen and wrote a friend, “It appears an endless business when we cast our eye over so vast a plain of white with a production, the gathering of which is to be effected by the application of the fingers to every individual pod; and these pods as thick as they can stand one by the side of the other. It is discouraging indeed.”
It didn’t take long for settlers to discover that Alabama soil was ideal for growing cotton. Planters from the Atlantic Coast states brought their slaves south and established huge cotton plantations, dominating Alabama’s economy for the next forty years. 
Royall’s dispiriting tone hinted at an unpleasant but undeniable truth: to a large degree, Alabama’s economy rested on the backs of the enslaved men and women who produced and harvested most cotton. Bondsmen comprised approximately a third of the state’s total population in 1819, and in certain areas they represented half or more of all residents. While we admittedly know relatively little about the daily lives of most of the Alabama Territory’s white and Native American residents, we understand perhaps even less about those who cleared most of its first fields, tended a large portion of its early crops, and constructed so many of its first buildings. In the antebellum era, detailed business records of large plantations employing dozens, sometimes hundreds, of slaves offer glimpses of their everyday routines and living conditions, but fewer such materials survive from this earlier age. In large part, however, continuity unquestionably characterized the experience. Most of the forced labor performed by slaves on Alabama Territory farms and plantations differed only by scale from that of the following generation, and their living conditions varied little. Whether or not early Alabamians had any direct association with slavery, the difficult truth is that the institution’s presence doomed the enslaved to a permanent sub-citizen status and simultaneously defined the bottom rung in an emergent society below which no white man could fall.

Owing in no small part to cotton production’s profitability, the Alabama Territory featured exceedingly little industry outside of agricultural pursuits. Sawmills and gristmills ​became the core, if not the only, manufacturing enterprises in most early communities. Pursuits that would become mainstays in Alabama’s nineteenth-century industrial scene nonetheless trace their origins to the era. The state’s textile industry dates its establishment to the entrepreneurial activities of Madison County’s Charles Cabaniss (ca. 1815), forerunner of the noted Bell Factory, generally recognized as the state’s first successful textile manufacturing concern. To the west, in Franklin County, about the same time as Cabaniss began his operation, Pennsylvania native Joseph Heslip purchased a tract of land along Cedar Creek near the crossroads community of Russellville and built Alabama’s first blast iron furnace. Across the territory, pursuit of other visions for economic and community development were about to reach a fever pitch through the establishment of dozens of towns and cities.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Mike Bunn currently serves as director of operations at  Historic Blakeley State Park in Spanish Fort, Alabama. This department of Alabama Heritage magazine  is sponsored by the Alabama Bicentennial Commission and the Alabama Tourism Department.

    More Alabama Territory

    Archives

    October 2019
    July 2019
    April 2019
    January 2019
    November 2018
    July 2018
    April 2018
    January 2018
    October 2017
    July 2017

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

UA Disclaimer
UA Equal Opportunity
UA Privacy Policy 
Website comments or questions?  
Email ah.online@ua.edu