ALABAMA HERITAGE
  • Magazine
    • Current and Back Issues >
      • Back Issues 141-150 >
        • Issue 147, Winter 2023
        • Issue 146, Fall 2022
        • Issue 145, Summer 2022
        • Issue 144, Spring 2022
        • Issue 143, Winter 2022
        • Issue 142, Fall 2021
        • Issue 141, Summer 2021
      • Back Issues 131-140 >
        • Issue 140, Spring 2021
        • Issue 139, Winter 2021
        • Issue 138, Fall 2020
        • Issue 137, Summer 2020
        • Issue 136, Spring 2020
        • Issue 135, Winter 2020
        • Issue 134, Fall 2019
        • Issue 133, Summer 2019
        • Issue 132 Spring 2019
        • Issue 131, Winter 2019
      • Back Issues 121-130 >
        • Issue 130, Fall 2018
        • Issue 129, Summer 2018
        • Issue 128, Spring 2018
        • Issue 127, Winter 2018
        • Issue 126, Fall 2017
        • Issue 125 Summer 2017
        • Issue 124, Spring 2017
        • Issue 123, Winter 2017
        • Issue 122, Fall 2016
        • Issue 121, Summer 2016
      • Back Issues 111-120 >
        • Issue 120, Spring 2016
        • Issue 119, Winter 2016
        • Issue 118, Fall 2015
        • Issue 117, Summer 2015
        • Issue 116, Spring 2015
        • Issue 115, Winter 2015
        • Issue 114, Fall 2014
        • Issue 113, Summer 2014
        • Issue 112, Spring 2014
        • Issue 111, Winter 2014
      • Back Issues 101-110 >
        • Issue 110, Fall 2013
        • Issue 109, Summer 2013
        • Issue 108, Spring 2013
        • Issue 107, Winter 2013
        • Issue 106, Fall 2012
        • Issue 105, Summer 2012
        • Issue 104, Spring 2012
        • Issue 103, Winter 2012
        • Issue 102, Fall 2011
        • Issue 101, Summer 2011
      • Back Issues 91-100 >
        • Issue 100, Spring 2011
        • Issue 99, Winter 2011
        • Issue 98, Fall 2010
        • Issue 97, Summer 2010
        • Issue 96, Spring 2010
        • Issue 95, Winter 2010
        • Issue 94, Fall 2009
        • Issue 93, Summer 2009
        • Issue 92, Spring 2009
        • Issue 91, Winter 2009
      • Back Issues 81-90 >
        • Issue 90, Fall 2008
        • Issue 89, Summer 2008
        • Issue 88, Spring 2008
        • Issue 87, Winter 2008
        • Issue 86, Fall 2007
        • Issue 85, Summer 2007
        • Issue 84, Spring 2007
        • Issue 83, Winter 2007
        • Issue 82, Fall 2006
        • Issue 81, Summer 2006
      • Back Issues 71-80 >
        • Issue 80, Spring 2006
        • Issue 79, Winter 2006
        • Issue 78, Fall 2005
        • Issue 77, Summer 2005
        • Issue 76, Spring 2005
        • Issue 75, Winter 2005
        • Issue 74, Fall 2004
        • Issue 73, Summer 2004
        • Issue 72, Spring 2004
        • Issue 71, Winter 2004
      • Back Issues 61-70 >
        • Issue 70, Fall 2003
        • Issue 69, Summer 2003
        • Issue 68, Spring 2003
        • Issue 67, Winter 2003
        • Issue 66, Fall 2002
        • Issue 65, Summer 2002
        • Issue 64, Spring 2002
        • Issue 63, Winter 2002
        • Issue 62, Fall 2001
        • Issue 61, Summer 2001
      • Back Issues 51-60 >
        • Issue 60, Spring 2001
        • Issue 59, Winter 2001
        • Issue 58, Fall 2000
        • Issue 57, Summer 2000
        • Issue 56, Spring 2000
        • Issue 55, Winter 2000
        • Issue 54, Fall 1999
        • Issue 53, Summer 1999
        • Issue 52, Spring 1999
        • Issue 51, Winter 1999
      • Back Issues 41-50 >
        • Issue 50, Fall 1998
        • Issue 49, Summer 1998
        • Issue 48, Spring 1998
        • Issue 47, Winter 1998
        • Issue 46, Fall 1997
        • Issue 45, Summer 1997
        • Issue 44, Spring 1997
        • Issue 43, Winter 1997
        • Issue 42, Fall 1996
        • Issue 41, Summer 1996
      • Back Issues 31-40 >
        • Issue 40, Spring 1996
        • Issue 39, Winter 1996
        • Issue 38, Fall 1995
        • Issue 37, Summer 1995
        • Issue 36, Spring 1995
        • Issue 35, Winter 1995
        • Issue 34, Fall 1994
        • Issue 33, Summer 1994
        • Issue 32, Spring 1994
        • Issue 31, Winter 1994
      • Back Issues 21-30 >
        • Issue 30, Fall 1993
        • Issue 29, Summer 1993
        • Issue 28, Spring 1993
        • Issue 27, Winter 1993
        • Issue 26, Fall 1992
        • Issue 25, Summer 1992
        • Issue 24, Spring 1992
        • Issue 23, Winter 1992
        • Issue 22, Fall 1991
        • Issue 21, Summer 1991
      • Back Issues 11-20 >
        • Issue 20, Spring 1991
        • Issue 19, Winter 1991
        • Issue 18, Fall 1990
        • Issue 17, Summer 1990
        • Issue 16, Spring 1990
        • Issue 15, Winter 1990
        • Issue 14, Fall 1989
        • Issue 13, Summer 1989
        • Issue 12, Spring 1989
        • Issue 11, Winter 1989
      • Back Issues 1-10 >
        • Issue 10, Fall 1988
        • Issue 9, Summer 1988
        • Issue 8, Spring 1988
        • Issue 7, Winter 1988
        • Issue 6, Fall 1987
        • Issue 5, Summer 1987
        • Issue 4, Spring 1987
        • Issue 3, Winter 1987
        • Issue 2, Fall 1986
        • Issue 1, Summer 1986
    • Digital Features
    • Links of Interest
    • Bonus Materials >
      • Adventures in Genealogy
      • Alabama Heritage Blog
      • Alabama Territory
      • Becoming Alabama >
        • Creek War Era
        • Civil War Era
        • Civil Rights Movement
      • From the Vault
      • History in Ruins
      • Places in Peril
      • Recipes
  • Online Store
    • Customer Service
  • About Us
    • Awards
    • Meet Our Team
    • News
    • Writer's Guidelines and Submissions
  • Search
  • Donate
Published by The University of Alabama,
The University of Alabama at Birmingham,
and the Alabama Department of Archives and History

Nathan Negus and the Portrait of Gen. William McIntosh

3/12/2018

 
Painting of General William McIntosh
The nine-foot painting of Gen. William McIntosh (c. 1778-1825) that hangs today at the Alabama Department of Archives and History, Montgomery, has long been regarded as a masterpiece of frontier art. Marie Bankhead Owen who directed the archives from 1920 to 1955, characterized the painting in 1946 as our "most valued treasure" and the "gem of our collection ," but Mrs. Owen, like many others of her day, misattributed the painting to the well-known artist Washington All ton (1779-1843), one of the earliest Romantic painters in America. Today we know that the McIntosh painting's true creator was Nathan Negus, assisted by his brother Joseph- young itinerant artists from Massachusetts. Only in the past few years has Nathan Negus become the subject of intense study, and though he was prolific in his short life, few of his works have been definitively identified; however, based on the available evidence, it seems clear that Negus was the most talented practitioner of fine arts in Alabama during the early statehood years, and the McIntosh portrait, though painted in Georgia, is the most striking artifact from that period.
​The painting's subject, William McIntosh, was one of the more colorful and controversial figures in the clash between Indian sovereignty and American expansion McIntosh was the biracial leader of the Lower Creek Indians, whose political headquarters were at Coweta on the Alabama side of the Chattahoochee River, about eight miles south of present-day Columbus, Georgia. His father was Scottish and his mother was Creek, and although he lived with the Indians, he also operated similarly to other whites of influence in the fluid frontier area of eastern Alabama and western Georgia: he owned a plantation and slaves in present-day Carroll County, Georgia, and entertained whites and Indians at a large Inn at Indian Springs in Butts County, Georgia, where this portrait was painted. A war hero, McIntosh served as commander of the Lower Creeks who fought with Andrew Jackson at Horseshoe Bend in 1814 and during the First Seminole War of 1818. An influential politician of dual stripes, he was first cousin to Georgia's governor George M. Troup and an eloquent spokesman for Indians, particularly in the early years of his career; in 1805 he traveled to Washington to present the Indian view regarding white expansion to President Thomas Jefferson. In the end, however, McIntosh’s primary allegiance was to him elf, and ultimately he was responsible for selling all the remaining Indian land in the state of Georgia to white in 1825. For this act, fellow Indians, especially the Upper Creeks, saw him as a traitor who sold out the Creek nation for personal greed. In consequence, the Upper Creeks brutally murdered him on April 30, 1825, only four years after this portrait was painted.
 
McIntosh’s double-dealing was made possible by "Alabama fever," a frenzied period of speculation and settlement that also attracted the Neguses to the frontier. Born in rural Petersham, Massachusetts, both boys had been influenced by their jack-of-all-trades father, one of whose talents was painting. Nathan, who had shown more artistic talent than Joseph early on, was selected for an artistic apprenticeship, while Joseph had gone to work for a Vermont relative in the mercantile trade. Since their father's death in 1816, both boys had been responsible for providing for their mother and sisters, and the new state of Alabama looked promising. In 1819, just as General McIntosh was beginning to reap the financial rewards of his many years of consorting with land-hungry whites, Joseph landed in Savannah, intent on going to the new Alabama capital at Cahawba to make a quick fortune, probably as a merchant. He made it as far as Eatonton, Georgia, before deciding to entice Nathan to join him. "I think we could make money very fast in the southern states for a year or two," he wrote his brother, telling him also of his recent success painting carriages in Eatonton.
 
Not particularly happy with his apprenticeship in Boston, Nathan left the city in late 1820 and sailed for Savannah. During a twelve-week stay, the talented nineteen- year-old dreamer made friends with actors and artists and attended the theatre, but he found little demand for his portraits because other artists had cornered the Savannah market.
 
In March 1821 Nathan joined Joseph in Eatonton, only twenty-one miles from the Georgia capital at Milledgeville. They became active Freemasons, an association that provided entree for several portraits as well as work painting the Masonic Hall and Masonic aprons and regalia. They also painted commercial signs and scenery for the local theatre. But Nathan was restless, and he traveled around the area at every opportunity, following the drama companies and seeking work painting portraits.
 
Although the exact circumstances of the meeting are unknown, it was during this period that he landed the commission to paint William McIntosh. In January 1821, McIntosh and other chiefs had met with representatives of the United States and the state of Georgia and signed the first Treaty of Indian Springs, which provided Georgia with all the Indian land between the Oakmulgee and Flint Rivers. For his part in orchestrating the deal, McIntosh received $10,000 in hand and one thousand acres around Indian Springs for himself. McIntosh’s wealth and influence made him a likely candidate for self-aggrandizement and just the type of catch a confident but unrecognized artist would like to net. He had money to pay for a portrait but not the experience or sophistication that would lead him to spurn upstart and unknown artists. He also had an exoticism about him because of his race and dress that made him interesting to paint.
 
The Negus brothers traveled to Indian Springs in May of 1821 and over the course of the next few weeks painted the full-length portrait of William McIntosh and a head-sized portrait of McIntosh’s young daughter. Compared to other portraits painted in the South during this period, the painting of General McIntosh is overpowering. Though the figure's stance is a bit awkward, as are the placement of the features and the head position, Negus' McIntosh dominates the canvas, a grand but still human figure. At the time, McIntosh was forty-two years old, tall and handsome with curly black hair and a muscular body. The most striking paint application in the portrait is the depiction of the clothing, representing the duality of McIntosh’s red and white worlds. The ceremonial cloak and coat, from which emerge an American-style ruffled shirt and tie, are decorated with embroidered rosettes and overlaid with beaded-and-fringed belt, sash, and pouch. Fringed leggings and moccasins complete the Indian elements of his attire.
Negus placed McIntosh in a quasi-real romantic landscape, following the European scenographers' practice of choosing real and imagined elements and placing them where they were needed for dramatic effect. The landscape is rugged, yet fragile and mysterious, and very similar to several widely known Italian landscape prints of the time
McIntosh must have liked the portrait because he transported it to his headquarters at Coweta, near the new Federal Road, where practically all travelers from Georgia to Alabama would pass. It is fortunate that he did not take the painting home because his plantation house burned to the ground at the time of his murder in 1825, and all of his property at Indian Springs reverted back to the state of Georgia. McIntosh’s oldest son, Chilly, inherited his father's portrait and valued the painting enough to keep it on di splay in Coweta. Chilly and many of the Lower Creeks removed to the west in 1826, but he returned to Alabama on occasion, and apparently on one of those trips, in 1832, he sold his father's portrait to James Kivlin. A Philadelphia-born entrepreneur, Kivlin had come to the new town of Columbus, Georgia, in the late 1820s and opened a tavern. That tavern, the "Sans Souci," was home to the McIntosh portrait for the next sixty years. It hung behind the bar over the cigar counter, where it could be seen through the window, and was known as the "Big Indian."
 
The transfer of the painting from Columbus to Montgomery was occasioned partly by chance. Peter Brannon, working as a curator for the Alabama Department of Archives and History since 1910, had grown up near Columbus, Georgia, and had known of the McIntosh painting from childhood. Aware of McIntosh’s role in the early history of east Alabama, Brannon wanted the striking painting to hang in a proper place in the state. He negotiated with the Kivlin heirs over a period of ten years, and fin ally, in 1922, with the approval of archives director Marie Bankhead Owen, purchased the pain ting for the state of Alabama for $500. It hung in the state capitol in Montgomery, by the speaker's chair in the House of Representatives, until 1943, when it was moved to the newly constructed archives building.
 
The misattribution to Allston came about because Brannon incorrectly deciphered the monogram on General McIntosh’s right moccasin toe. He thought the fancy entwined letters read “WA."- Washington Allston- but, in fact, they are the initials of Nathan and Joseph Negus. The incorrect attribution was perpetuated until 1957, when a Connecticut art historian, Agnes Dods, acquired one of Nathan Negus' diaries from the 1820s and published an article in Antiques magazine on the Negus brothers. She and a rather indignant Peter Brannon, who had been delighted to have an Allston in the archives' collection, exchanged many letters over several months. Finally, in view of Dods' overwhelming evidence, Brannon acquiesced: the portrait was by Negus.
 
Sadly, the young painter was not destined to realize his early promise as an artist. In 1822 the Negus brothers left Georgia and settled in Cahawba, Alabama, where they continued to paint murals, houses and carriages, and portraits. Joseph married in 1822 and died the next year from yellow fever. Nathan moved to Mobile in 1823, where for the next two years he painted portraits and signs, as well as scenery for Noah Ludlow's American Theatre Company. Chronically ill from consumption, he returned to Massachusetts in 1825 and died only days after his arrival. Ironically, he was buried less than three months after General McIntosh.
 
In the tangled web of Indian removal in the 1820s and 1830s, the connection between Nathan and Joseph Negus and the McIntosh portrait was lost. Young men without artistic reputations, they had no one except several adoring sisters in faraway New England to keep the story of their talent alive. The deaths of McIntosh and Nathan Negus in the same year further ensured the clouding and fading of their acquaintance. But now, 177 years after the portrait was completed, Nathan Negus is finally receiving the recognition he deserves. In 1997 archives staff placed a new attribution plaque on the General McIntosh portrait, united at last with its true creator, the very talented Nathan Negus.

This feature was previously published in Issue 50, Fall 1998.

About the Author
Laquita Thomson is an independent researcher specializing in the history of art and culture in Alabama. She lives in Georgia.
Subscribe to Alabama Heritage

Comments are closed.

    From the Vault

    Read complete classic articles and departments featured in Alabama Heritage magazine in the past 35 years of publishing. You'll find in-depth features along with quirky and fun departments that cover the people, places, and events that make our state great!

    Read More From the Vault

    Archives

    February 2023
    January 2023
    August 2022
    June 2022
    February 2022
    June 2021
    May 2021
    July 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    April 2015
    July 2014
    April 2014
    October 2013
    October 2012
    July 2012
    October 2009

    Categories

    All
    African Americans
    Agriculture
    Alabama
    Archeaology
    Architecture
    Avondale
    Avondale Zoo
    Birmingham
    Business
    Cathedral Caverns
    Civil War
    Constitution
    Cuba
    Episcopal Church
    Food
    Guntersville
    Hollywood
    Hunting
    Murder
    Mystery
    National Guard
    Native American
    Nursing
    Photography
    Poarch Creek Indians
    Politics
    Preservation
    Quilts
    Religion
    Revolutionary War
    Sand Mountain
    Whiskey
    Women
    WWI
    WWII

    RSS Feed

Online Store
​Customer Service
Meet Our Team
Board of Directors
Corporate Sponsors
News
Join Our Email List

Employment
UA Disclaimer
UA Privacy Policy ​
​Website comments or questions?  

Email ah.online@ua.edu
Published by The University of Alabama, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, and the Alabama Department of Archives and History
​Alabama Heritage
Box 870342
Tuscaloosa, AL 35487
Local: (205) 348-7467
Toll-Free: (877) 925-2323
Fax: (205) 348-7473

alabama.heritage@ua.edu