ALABAMA HERITAGE
  • Magazine
    • Current and Back Issues >
      • Back Issues 141-150 >
        • Issue 147, Winter 2023
        • Issue 146, Fall 2022
        • Issue 145, Summer 2022
        • Issue 144, Spring 2022
        • Issue 143, Winter 2022
        • Issue 142, Fall 2021
        • Issue 141, Summer 2021
      • Back Issues 131-140 >
        • Issue 140, Spring 2021
        • Issue 139, Winter 2021
        • Issue 138, Fall 2020
        • Issue 137, Summer 2020
        • Issue 136, Spring 2020
        • Issue 135, Winter 2020
        • Issue 134, Fall 2019
        • Issue 133, Summer 2019
        • Issue 132 Spring 2019
        • Issue 131, Winter 2019
      • Back Issues 121-130 >
        • Issue 130, Fall 2018
        • Issue 129, Summer 2018
        • Issue 128, Spring 2018
        • Issue 127, Winter 2018
        • Issue 126, Fall 2017
        • Issue 125 Summer 2017
        • Issue 124, Spring 2017
        • Issue 123, Winter 2017
        • Issue 122, Fall 2016
        • Issue 121, Summer 2016
      • Back Issues 111-120 >
        • Issue 120, Spring 2016
        • Issue 119, Winter 2016
        • Issue 118, Fall 2015
        • Issue 117, Summer 2015
        • Issue 116, Spring 2015
        • Issue 115, Winter 2015
        • Issue 114, Fall 2014
        • Issue 113, Summer 2014
        • Issue 112, Spring 2014
        • Issue 111, Winter 2014
      • Back Issues 101-110 >
        • Issue 110, Fall 2013
        • Issue 109, Summer 2013
        • Issue 108, Spring 2013
        • Issue 107, Winter 2013
        • Issue 106, Fall 2012
        • Issue 105, Summer 2012
        • Issue 104, Spring 2012
        • Issue 103, Winter 2012
        • Issue 102, Fall 2011
        • Issue 101, Summer 2011
      • Back Issues 91-100 >
        • Issue 100, Spring 2011
        • Issue 99, Winter 2011
        • Issue 98, Fall 2010
        • Issue 97, Summer 2010
        • Issue 96, Spring 2010
        • Issue 95, Winter 2010
        • Issue 94, Fall 2009
        • Issue 93, Summer 2009
        • Issue 92, Spring 2009
        • Issue 91, Winter 2009
      • Back Issues 81-90 >
        • Issue 90, Fall 2008
        • Issue 89, Summer 2008
        • Issue 88, Spring 2008
        • Issue 87, Winter 2008
        • Issue 86, Fall 2007
        • Issue 85, Summer 2007
        • Issue 84, Spring 2007
        • Issue 83, Winter 2007
        • Issue 82, Fall 2006
        • Issue 81, Summer 2006
      • Back Issues 71-80 >
        • Issue 80, Spring 2006
        • Issue 79, Winter 2006
        • Issue 78, Fall 2005
        • Issue 77, Summer 2005
        • Issue 76, Spring 2005
        • Issue 75, Winter 2005
        • Issue 74, Fall 2004
        • Issue 73, Summer 2004
        • Issue 72, Spring 2004
        • Issue 71, Winter 2004
      • Back Issues 61-70 >
        • Issue 70, Fall 2003
        • Issue 69, Summer 2003
        • Issue 68, Spring 2003
        • Issue 67, Winter 2003
        • Issue 66, Fall 2002
        • Issue 65, Summer 2002
        • Issue 64, Spring 2002
        • Issue 63, Winter 2002
        • Issue 62, Fall 2001
        • Issue 61, Summer 2001
      • Back Issues 51-60 >
        • Issue 60, Spring 2001
        • Issue 59, Winter 2001
        • Issue 58, Fall 2000
        • Issue 57, Summer 2000
        • Issue 56, Spring 2000
        • Issue 55, Winter 2000
        • Issue 54, Fall 1999
        • Issue 53, Summer 1999
        • Issue 52, Spring 1999
        • Issue 51, Winter 1999
      • Back Issues 41-50 >
        • Issue 50, Fall 1998
        • Issue 49, Summer 1998
        • Issue 48, Spring 1998
        • Issue 47, Winter 1998
        • Issue 46, Fall 1997
        • Issue 45, Summer 1997
        • Issue 44, Spring 1997
        • Issue 43, Winter 1997
        • Issue 42, Fall 1996
        • Issue 41, Summer 1996
      • Back Issues 31-40 >
        • Issue 40, Spring 1996
        • Issue 39, Winter 1996
        • Issue 38, Fall 1995
        • Issue 37, Summer 1995
        • Issue 36, Spring 1995
        • Issue 35, Winter 1995
        • Issue 34, Fall 1994
        • Issue 33, Summer 1994
        • Issue 32, Spring 1994
        • Issue 31, Winter 1994
      • Back Issues 21-30 >
        • Issue 30, Fall 1993
        • Issue 29, Summer 1993
        • Issue 28, Spring 1993
        • Issue 27, Winter 1993
        • Issue 26, Fall 1992
        • Issue 25, Summer 1992
        • Issue 24, Spring 1992
        • Issue 23, Winter 1992
        • Issue 22, Fall 1991
        • Issue 21, Summer 1991
      • Back Issues 11-20 >
        • Issue 20, Spring 1991
        • Issue 19, Winter 1991
        • Issue 18, Fall 1990
        • Issue 17, Summer 1990
        • Issue 16, Spring 1990
        • Issue 15, Winter 1990
        • Issue 14, Fall 1989
        • Issue 13, Summer 1989
        • Issue 12, Spring 1989
        • Issue 11, Winter 1989
      • Back Issues 1-10 >
        • Issue 10, Fall 1988
        • Issue 9, Summer 1988
        • Issue 8, Spring 1988
        • Issue 7, Winter 1988
        • Issue 6, Fall 1987
        • Issue 5, Summer 1987
        • Issue 4, Spring 1987
        • Issue 3, Winter 1987
        • Issue 2, Fall 1986
        • Issue 1, Summer 1986
    • Digital Features
    • Links of Interest
    • Bonus Materials >
      • Adventures in Genealogy
      • Alabama Heritage Blog
      • Alabama Territory
      • Becoming Alabama >
        • Creek War Era
        • Civil War Era
        • Civil Rights Movement
      • From the Vault
      • History in Ruins
      • Places in Peril
      • Recipes
  • Online Store
    • Customer Service
  • About Us
    • Awards
    • Meet Our Team
    • News
    • Writer's Guidelines and Submissions
  • Search
  • Donate
Published by The University of Alabama,
The University of Alabama at Birmingham,
and the Alabama Department of Archives and History

Winter 1813: Blood on the Water

1/25/2013

 
In early 1813 the winter air was grey and barren, and the sun burned cold over what would soon become central Alabama. The Creeks’ desperate cultural balancing act between the loaded words “tradition” and “progress”–which increasingly seemed a generational dispute, almost as much as political or social contest–had exploded along the Ohio River in February.
Little Warrior and a small party of Red Stick Creeks killed two white families near the mouth of the river, and white settlers across the trans-Appalachian West demanded they be handed over. Given the rising tension in and around the Creek nation and across the West, neither the raid nor Benjamin Hawkins’s extradition request was particularly surprising. Disappointing perhaps, but not surprising. Still, Big Warrior and many of the older chiefs wearily looked for solace in the skies, but it would not come. Little Warrior’s bold but myopic audacity left the chiefs with a dilemma. Big Warrior, Speaker for the Upper Creeks and nominal voice of the moderates caught in the middle, knew he could not hand over Little Warrior to the whites and maintain respect and unity among his own people. Neither could he absolve the guilty and move on and avoid extralegal conflict with American settlers. To make matters worse, after Big Warrior had executed many of those responsible, Little Warrior himself escaped down the Black Warrior River and started gathering supporters among the Creeks there. Little Warrior, it now seemed clear, wanted a war between the Creeks to decide their cultural future, and the older chiefs understood that eventually they must oblige him. White settlement helped spark the tensions, but Creeks also viewed it as collateral: if war must come, they reasoned, better to keep the land-hungry Americans out of it. Thus, Big Warrior pronounced Little Warrior’s life forfeit and moved to assuage white fears of collusion. “You must not think from any conduct of the Little Warrior,” he wrote to territorial Judge Harry Toulmin in April, “that the chiefs are any foes of the whites. Should he commit any depredations there do not, by any rash means fall upon our villages that are above you, for they are friendly, and will not do anything that is not agreeable to the chiefs.” Big Warrior gave Toulmin carte blanche to kill Little Warrior, provided he visited any further atrocities upon white settlements. Big Warrior also urged the old judge to reach out to the Choctaws and Chickasaws to help bring Little Warrior down.

All of this was far more planned than accomplished. Little Warrior and those who supported his iconoclasm would make no more concessions to encroaching whites or to those who were either too old or too weak to resist the heady American cultural export of white “civilization.” But it is too simple, too clean, and far too neat to boil the coming Creek Civil War down to a doomed Luddite attempt to resist modernity. It is true that white encroachment on Creek lands, particularly near the Federal Road, certainly drove many dissidents to take up the red club of war. And to many, the National Council seemed too ready to bend to Hawkins’s will and too weak to prevent the continued impoverishment of many of the Creek peoples. Yet it was not a simple case of “have nots” rising against “haves.” Indeed, the Upper and Lower Creeks, and the myriad of other interests and points of view that led them to war, represented more than the sum of their fears. Their war was not simply a desperate reaction to forces beyond their control. Instead, Alabama’s Creeks sought to preserve their culture, as they understood it, for themselves and their posterity. In the end, it is probably more accurate to conclude that the Creek War was made possible by the tone and temper of the times (i.e., continuing white expansion down the Federal Road, coupled with economic hardship among many Creeks, and the confusion of America’s second war with Great Britain, among other things), rather than any one broad narrative or historical analysis. However, in 1813 factions of Upper and Lower Creeks, and a number of white and black settlers, did engage in war. Those choices, while informed by the needs of the moment, set the dark and bloody stage for the final act by which half of the Mississippi Territory became Alabama.

Comments are closed.

    Becoming Alabama:
    Creek War Era

    Author

    Joseph W. Pearson is a PhD student in the department of history at the University of Alabama. His research interests include the nineteenth-century South, antebellum politics, and political culture.

    (Click here to return to main Becoming Alabama page.)

    Archives

    April 2015
    January 2015
    October 2014
    July 2014
    April 2014
    January 2014
    October 2013
    July 2013
    April 2013
    January 2013
    October 2012
    July 2012
    April 2012
    January 2012
    October 2011
    July 2011
    April 2011
    January 2011
    October 2010
    July 2010
    April 2010
    January 2010

    Categories

    All
    Andrew Jackson
    Big Warrior
    Creeks
    Horeshoe Bend
    Mississippi Territory
    Native Americans
    New Orleans
    Redstick Creeks
    Treaty Of Fort Jackson
    Treaty Of Ghent
    War Of 1812

Online Store
​Customer Service
Meet Our Team
Board of Directors
Corporate Sponsors
News
Join Our Email List

Employment
UA Disclaimer
UA Privacy Policy ​
​Website comments or questions?  

Email ah.online@ua.edu
Published by The University of Alabama, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, and the Alabama Department of Archives and History
​Alabama Heritage
Box 870342
Tuscaloosa, AL 35487
Local: (205) 348-7467
Toll-Free: (877) 925-2323
Fax: (205) 348-7473

alabama.heritage@ua.edu