ALABAMA HERITAGE
  • Magazine
    • Current and Back Issues >
      • Back Issues 141-150 >
        • Issue 147, Winter 2023
        • Issue 146, Fall 2022
        • Issue 145, Summer 2022
        • Issue 144, Spring 2022
        • Issue 143, Winter 2022
        • Issue 142, Fall 2021
        • Issue 141, Summer 2021
      • Back Issues 131-140 >
        • Issue 140, Spring 2021
        • Issue 139, Winter 2021
        • Issue 138, Fall 2020
        • Issue 137, Summer 2020
        • Issue 136, Spring 2020
        • Issue 135, Winter 2020
        • Issue 134, Fall 2019
        • Issue 133, Summer 2019
        • Issue 132 Spring 2019
        • Issue 131, Winter 2019
      • Back Issues 121-130 >
        • Issue 130, Fall 2018
        • Issue 129, Summer 2018
        • Issue 128, Spring 2018
        • Issue 127, Winter 2018
        • Issue 126, Fall 2017
        • Issue 125 Summer 2017
        • Issue 124, Spring 2017
        • Issue 123, Winter 2017
        • Issue 122, Fall 2016
        • Issue 121, Summer 2016
      • Back Issues 111-120 >
        • Issue 120, Spring 2016
        • Issue 119, Winter 2016
        • Issue 118, Fall 2015
        • Issue 117, Summer 2015
        • Issue 116, Spring 2015
        • Issue 115, Winter 2015
        • Issue 114, Fall 2014
        • Issue 113, Summer 2014
        • Issue 112, Spring 2014
        • Issue 111, Winter 2014
      • Back Issues 101-110 >
        • Issue 110, Fall 2013
        • Issue 109, Summer 2013
        • Issue 108, Spring 2013
        • Issue 107, Winter 2013
        • Issue 106, Fall 2012
        • Issue 105, Summer 2012
        • Issue 104, Spring 2012
        • Issue 103, Winter 2012
        • Issue 102, Fall 2011
        • Issue 101, Summer 2011
      • Back Issues 91-100 >
        • Issue 100, Spring 2011
        • Issue 99, Winter 2011
        • Issue 98, Fall 2010
        • Issue 97, Summer 2010
        • Issue 96, Spring 2010
        • Issue 95, Winter 2010
        • Issue 94, Fall 2009
        • Issue 93, Summer 2009
        • Issue 92, Spring 2009
        • Issue 91, Winter 2009
      • Back Issues 81-90 >
        • Issue 90, Fall 2008
        • Issue 89, Summer 2008
        • Issue 88, Spring 2008
        • Issue 87, Winter 2008
        • Issue 86, Fall 2007
        • Issue 85, Summer 2007
        • Issue 84, Spring 2007
        • Issue 83, Winter 2007
        • Issue 82, Fall 2006
        • Issue 81, Summer 2006
      • Back Issues 71-80 >
        • Issue 80, Spring 2006
        • Issue 79, Winter 2006
        • Issue 78, Fall 2005
        • Issue 77, Summer 2005
        • Issue 76, Spring 2005
        • Issue 75, Winter 2005
        • Issue 74, Fall 2004
        • Issue 73, Summer 2004
        • Issue 72, Spring 2004
        • Issue 71, Winter 2004
      • Back Issues 61-70 >
        • Issue 70, Fall 2003
        • Issue 69, Summer 2003
        • Issue 68, Spring 2003
        • Issue 67, Winter 2003
        • Issue 66, Fall 2002
        • Issue 65, Summer 2002
        • Issue 64, Spring 2002
        • Issue 63, Winter 2002
        • Issue 62, Fall 2001
        • Issue 61, Summer 2001
      • Back Issues 51-60 >
        • Issue 60, Spring 2001
        • Issue 59, Winter 2001
        • Issue 58, Fall 2000
        • Issue 57, Summer 2000
        • Issue 56, Spring 2000
        • Issue 55, Winter 2000
        • Issue 54, Fall 1999
        • Issue 53, Summer 1999
        • Issue 52, Spring 1999
        • Issue 51, Winter 1999
      • Back Issues 41-50 >
        • Issue 50, Fall 1998
        • Issue 49, Summer 1998
        • Issue 48, Spring 1998
        • Issue 47, Winter 1998
        • Issue 46, Fall 1997
        • Issue 45, Summer 1997
        • Issue 44, Spring 1997
        • Issue 43, Winter 1997
        • Issue 42, Fall 1996
        • Issue 41, Summer 1996
      • Back Issues 31-40 >
        • Issue 40, Spring 1996
        • Issue 39, Winter 1996
        • Issue 38, Fall 1995
        • Issue 37, Summer 1995
        • Issue 36, Spring 1995
        • Issue 35, Winter 1995
        • Issue 34, Fall 1994
        • Issue 33, Summer 1994
        • Issue 32, Spring 1994
        • Issue 31, Winter 1994
      • Back Issues 21-30 >
        • Issue 30, Fall 1993
        • Issue 29, Summer 1993
        • Issue 28, Spring 1993
        • Issue 27, Winter 1993
        • Issue 26, Fall 1992
        • Issue 25, Summer 1992
        • Issue 24, Spring 1992
        • Issue 23, Winter 1992
        • Issue 22, Fall 1991
        • Issue 21, Summer 1991
      • Back Issues 11-20 >
        • Issue 20, Spring 1991
        • Issue 19, Winter 1991
        • Issue 18, Fall 1990
        • Issue 17, Summer 1990
        • Issue 16, Spring 1990
        • Issue 15, Winter 1990
        • Issue 14, Fall 1989
        • Issue 13, Summer 1989
        • Issue 12, Spring 1989
        • Issue 11, Winter 1989
      • Back Issues 1-10 >
        • Issue 10, Fall 1988
        • Issue 9, Summer 1988
        • Issue 8, Spring 1988
        • Issue 7, Winter 1988
        • Issue 6, Fall 1987
        • Issue 5, Summer 1987
        • Issue 4, Spring 1987
        • Issue 3, Winter 1987
        • Issue 2, Fall 1986
        • Issue 1, Summer 1986
    • Digital Features
    • Links of Interest
    • Bonus Materials >
      • Adventures in Genealogy
      • Alabama Heritage Blog
      • Alabama Territory
      • Becoming Alabama >
        • Creek War Era
        • Civil War Era
        • Civil Rights Movement
      • From the Vault
      • History in Ruins
      • Places in Peril
      • Recipes
  • Online Store
    • Customer Service
  • About Us
    • Awards
    • Meet Our Team
    • News
    • Writer's Guidelines and Submissions
  • Search
  • Donate
Published by The University of Alabama,
The University of Alabama at Birmingham,
and the Alabama Department of Archives and History

“The WAC is a soldier too”: Alabama and the Women’s Army Corps  

8/23/2016

 
WAC Corps Fort McClellan
Women train for active duty at Fort McClellan in 1955. (Alabama Archives)
In 1944 the Birmingham News characterized the Women’s Army Corps, or WAC, post at Anniston’s Fort McClellan as being more like a sorority house on a university campus than like a military barrack housing enlisted women. Noting the bowling alley, golf course, and post club, the paper lauded the role of WACs in the war eff ort but also patronizingly saw their work as largely frivolous when compared with that of their male counterparts. As the paper observed of a woman repairing a large rifle, “[I]t is not a soldier, it’s a WAC.” Even as women who served in the WAC during World War II (WWII) faced questions about their contributions, however, they felt that serving their country was worth the trials of basic training, the low pay, and the scrutiny they received. Indeed, during WWII and the Cold War that followed, the WAC evolved to overcome these challenges by improving the benefits of women’s service, countering opposition, and ultimately illustrating its commitment to female soldiers by making the post at Fort McClellan into a permanent training facility. 
In 1941 Massachusetts Congresswomen Edith Nourse Rogers introduced a bill to establish the Women’s Auxiliary Army Corps, in the belief that it could simultaneously give women the opportunity to assist in the war eff ort and free up additional men for combat. Though this initial legislation did not provide the equal pay and service benefits for women that Rogers had hoped for, in 1943 legislators removed the “auxiliary” title from the Corps and granted enlisted women full military status, along with pay and benefits similar to those provided to men in the Regular Army. WAC legislation also opened jobs for women in the military beyond those of clerical and domestic work and increased the number of recruits. Bases around the country soon adjusted their barracks and other facilities to accommodate the influx. By 1944 more than three hundred women were stationed at Fort McClellan alone, working in mess halls, hospitals, motor pools, and communication divisions. No matter whether they worked as switchboard operators or mechanics, WACs—moved to enlist either by witnessing male relatives joining the military or simply from patriotic motives— considered their service essential. As one WAC at Fort McClellan remarked, “You can’t win a war by staying home.”
 
By the end of WWII, more than 100,000 women had served in the Corps. Although the WAC became a permanent part of the Army in 1948 and supplied critical noncombat support during the Korean War, the lack of a permanent home for the Corps presented training and organizational challenges. Army officials scoured the country for a location, eventually determining that Alabama’s mild winter temperatures and the proximity of Anniston to regional airports made Fort McClellan the ideal spot. In 1952 Congress approved funds to build the WAC Training Center there, and it opened in 1954 after a multimillion-dollar renovation, ready to house 2,400 enlisted women.
By 1944 more than three hundred women were stationed at Fort McClellan alone, working in mess halls, hospitals, motor pools, and communication divisions.
By that point, however, military officials found themselves confronted with recruitment problems. Recruitment eff orts, in fact, had sputtered somewhat even during WWII. In part, this was because legislators, military leaders, and the general public expressed concern about women assuming combat roles, a notion that no one actually suggested. In somewhat larger measures, however, many feared that women’s military service threatened their traditional roles as wives, mothers, and homemakers, and that WACs might usurp supposedly male responsibilities to protect the family and the state. As one congressman had scoffed at Edith Nourse Rogers’s original bill, “A Woman’s Army to defend the United States of America! Think of the humiliation. What has become of the manhood of America that we have to call on our women to do what has always been the duty of men?”
 
To alleviate these sorts of anxieties, government recruitment campaigns stressed links between WAC training and acceptable expressions of femininity. For example, as part of “The Big Picture,” a weekly television series that highlighted Army activities, Corps leaders made sure to note that among the first lessons WACs learned at the new facility at Fort McClellan were those in “meticulous grooming and feminine grace.” Narrators of the episode about the new training facility told viewers that appearance was of the utmost importance for the WACs and that the Corps had hired fashion icon Hattie Carnegie to design their uniforms. They focused further attention on the wholesomeness of the facility, where female residents would be encouraged to decorate their rooms, play on the golf course, attend coed dances, and join the WAC band. 
Compounding concerns about gender roles and problems with recruitment for the WACs were lingering racial conflicts. ... Though racial problems remained muted through the 1960s, they never disappeared altogether, and they burst to the surface again late in 1971.
Compounding concerns about gender roles and problems with recruitment for the WACs were lingering racial conflicts. Despite the integration of the armed forces in 1948, African American WACs regularly reported institutionalized racism at Fort McClellan. In 1955 they informed a member of Congress that the post’s club was restricted to whites only and that fort staff forbade them from fraternizing or dancing with white soldiers, and they charged that only black barbers would cut and style their hair. Though racial problems remained muted through the 1960s, they never disappeared altogether, and they burst to the surface again late in 1971. One night in particular held several conflicts: two male soldiers—one black and one white—got into an altercation at an off -base nightclub, and several black WACs sustained injuries when a white officer ran them down with his vehicle as they walked back to the fort. Afterward, more than one hundred black WACs and male soldiers refused to dress and report for duty. Instead, the group marched on a base field to protest persistent discrimination and, when a meeting with a representative for the post commander failed to alleviate their concerns, military police charged sixty-five black WACs with disorderly conduct and disobeying orders. Within weeks the post commander dropped the charges, and a report on the incident acknowledged “the need to improve communications upwards as well as down with the young soldiers, and especially the young black soldiers.” Still, the incident was resolved largely through the transfer of many of the black service members involved in the protest.
 
WACs encountered a range of experiences between the 1940s and the 1970s. They traveled, learned new skills, faced discrimination, and saw war, serving in Vietnam as they had in all foreign entanglements since the inception of the Corps. But the post-Vietnam era saw significant changes. By that time, the women’s movement had posed serious challenges to traditional gender norms, and WAC basic training had evolved such that it steadily incorporated combat skills. Both the Army and Congress came to recognize the inefficiency and illogic of continuing to segregate women in the service, and consolidated training and the enrollment of women at West Point began in 1976. With women integrated into Regular Army training, a separate WAC unit was no longer necessary. Women began joining their male counterparts at training bases around the country, and on December 1, 1976, the Army transferred the WAC Center from Fort McClellan to Fort Lee in Virginia in preparation for dismantling the Corps altogether. Ironically, only when the task was completed in 1978 did one of the songs of the Fort McClellan WAC band ring true: “The WAC Is a Soldier Too.”

This article was originally published in Alabama Heritage Issue #112, Spring 2014.

Author

Stephanie Chalifoux graduated with her PhD in history from the University of Alabama in 2013 and is currently an adjunct instructor for the history department. Joshua D. Rothman, standing editor of the “Alabama Women” department of Alabama Heritage, is professor of history at the University of Alabama and director of the university’s Frances S. Summersell Center for the Study of the South, which sponsors this department.

Wilma williams
5/27/2017 03:53:44 pm

I lost my WAC black onyx ring 1971 at ft McClellan do you know where I can get another one I am proud to be a WAC


Comments are closed.

    From the Vault

    Read complete classic articles and departments featured in Alabama Heritage magazine in the past 35 years of publishing. You'll find in-depth features along with quirky and fun departments that cover the people, places, and events that make our state great!

    Read More From the Vault

    Archives

    February 2023
    January 2023
    August 2022
    June 2022
    February 2022
    June 2021
    May 2021
    July 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    April 2015
    July 2014
    April 2014
    October 2013
    October 2012
    July 2012
    October 2009

    Categories

    All
    African Americans
    Agriculture
    Alabama
    Archeaology
    Architecture
    Avondale
    Avondale Zoo
    Birmingham
    Business
    Cathedral Caverns
    Civil War
    Constitution
    Cuba
    Episcopal Church
    Food
    Guntersville
    Hollywood
    Hunting
    Murder
    Mystery
    National Guard
    Native American
    Nursing
    Photography
    Poarch Creek Indians
    Politics
    Preservation
    Quilts
    Religion
    Revolutionary War
    Sand Mountain
    Whiskey
    Women
    WWI
    WWII

    RSS Feed

Online Store
​Customer Service
Meet Our Team
Board of Directors
Corporate Sponsors
News
Join Our Email List

Employment
UA Disclaimer
UA Privacy Policy ​
​Website comments or questions?  

Email ah.online@ua.edu
Published by The University of Alabama, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, and the Alabama Department of Archives and History
​Alabama Heritage
Box 870342
Tuscaloosa, AL 35487
Local: (205) 348-7467
Toll-Free: (877) 925-2323
Fax: (205) 348-7473

alabama.heritage@ua.edu